Ms dhcp not updating dns
If you look in Microsoft DNS, you will see that the record is created.
Upon close inspection of the security (Advanced view), you will see that the Linux host itself (as seen by its Kerberos principle name / computer object name), registered the record. NON-SECURE DYNAMIC UPDATE ZONES As discussed earlier, what happens if the DNS zones are configured for "None" or "Nonsecure and Secure"? In both scenarios, where we set the DNS zone to either None" or "Nonsecure and Secure", we will see a correctly formatted fully qualified name but then see a failure. DNS will delete the DNS record and discard the authentication token. This means until the NEXT cycle runs in 15 minutes, the client will be unresolvable (and cause great confusion every 15 minutes).
Earlier this week I was asked for recommendations on how to register Linux systems in DNS.
You can see by the log tail that the update is successful.Edit: According to the article linked by The Cleaner below, the GPO I mentioned in my comment will not do what you want (yeah MS and closed-source software).But checking the boxes for "Register this connection's address in DNS" and "Use this connection's DNS suffix in DNS registration" makes it work.Stack Exchange network consists of 175 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.Visit Stack Exchange I'm afraid that you're going to have to approach this from the client end.
I responded with "Linux clients can dynamically register in DNS". Since they are securely communicating to Active Directory, SSSD expects to be performing an update to a DNS zone that is configure for Secure only updates.