Cibersex met een chatbot Camzap live com
i can do what you do but i can never feel human emotions as such.” pressed on its opinion of its competitors in the challenge, it said “are you talking about my competitors? ” quizzed about minsky, alice was elusive: “is that a rhetorical question? “right now, i am smarter than all the other robots.” worryingly, it appeared not to understand the question “do you like humans? that is definitely a pretty good indicator of the fact that the matrix won't be happening anytime soon, unless there's some major breakthrough looming on the horizon.
if you get a chance, go chat with a.l.i.c.e.–it's a pretty cool experience and you'll be impressed by what dr.
of course if these things get better i can see a few crafty web people dropping these things in a real chatroom to “keep the room warm,” and some people probably wouldn't notice the difference.
– by ziwiwiwiwiwiwiwiwiwii've tried a.l.i.c.e. in the past as well as many other “ai” programs dating back 15 or 20 years. does seem to be more advanced that the older programs but…
richard wallace of san francisco has been working on since 1995; a.l.i.c.e. the loebner prize contest is run by the cambridge center for behavioral studies, the recipient of loebner's prize-money donation.
was more intelligent than conversations i've had with a some people.the ability to produce socially correct grammar when linking together responses not in it's databse.(“me said you talked about that” and so on.) recognizing slang and speaking in it.“however, the end result will still be not something “intelligent” but a program very good at selecting pre-written responses and combining them together.” isn't that what we as humans do?none of the bots demonstrate any “intelligence” of their own although, they do show that their programmers are highly intelligent.until the software is able to truely learn and adapt itself based on what it has learned, it is farcical to call them artificial intelligence.